THE ROLE OF FISCAL POLICY IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Milan B. Mihajlović Војна академија Београд
  • Dejan R. Jeremić Sequester Employment Београд

Keywords:

environment, fiscal policy, taxes

Abstract

A healthy environment is considered one of the key conditions for human survival on planet Earth. Shortterm profits have become more difficult than longterm existence. Over time, small profits have resulted in catastrophic consequences for the environment. This problem requires a complex approach from a number of angles. One of them is the legal and economic ways to stand in the way of further environmental degradation. The legal or regulatory method is based on the principle of "order and control". The economic or market method uses more complex instruments of environmental protection, such as various taxes, fees and charges. The economic method is more complex because in addition to the positive impact on the environment The problem of economic instruments is that it usually requires certain payments due to which it can become hated and avoided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brnjas, Z., Stošić, I., Dedeić, P. (2015): Socio-ekonomska analiza i upravljanje rizikom od zagađenosti životne sredine, Ecologica, 80, 609-612

Goulder, L., Perry, W.H. (2008): Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy, Discussion paper, Resources for the Future, DP 08-07, April 2008.

Dejović, S. (2018): Nastanak i razvoj poreskih rajeva. Oditor, 4(2), 17-26.

Đurić, O. (2012): Srbija u svetlu ekološke poreske reforme EU, Socioeconomica – The Scientific Journal for Theory and Practice of Socioeconomic Development, 1(2), 281 – 290.

Ercolano, S., Gaeta G.L., Romano, O. (2013): Environmental tax reform and individual preferences: An empirical analysis on European micro data, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 51, 1-11

European Environment Agency. (1996): Environmental taxes, Implementation and Environmental Effectivness, Copenhagen.

Ilić, P.G.(2000): Ekološki porezi, Savet projekta „Konstituisanje Srbije kao pravne države“ i Centar za publikacije Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Pantić, N., Jovanović, B., Issa H.R. (2019): Oporezivanje u funkciji održivog razvoja, Održivi razvoj, 1(2), str. 37-51

Pantić, N., & Rosić, M. (2019): Karakteristike projektovanja ekoloških naknada. Održivi razvoj, 1(1), 29-42.

Prdić, N. (2019): Efekti investicije - maksimalne cene u aukcijskoj trgovini. Oditor, 5(3), 25-37.

Prdić, N. (2019): Efekti trgovine na berzi, Kultura polisa, 16(40), 353-362

Raičević, B. (2008): Javne finansije, drugo izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje, Ekonomski fakultet, Beograd.

Stojanović, C., Stanojević, P. (2017): Ciljevi organizacionog sistema i IMS-a, Akcionarstvo, Vol. 23, br. 1, 5-18.

Taggart, P. (2015): Why do states adopt environmental tax incentives? Arts and Humanities, 6, 46-52.

Uredba o vrstama otpada za koje se vrši termički tretman, usloviima i kriterijumima za određivanje lokacije, tehničkim i tehnološkim uslovima za projektovanje, izgradnju, opremanje i rad postrojenja za termički tretman otpada, postupanju sa ostatkom nakon spaljeivanja ("Sl. glasnik rs", br. 102/2010 i 50/2012).

Fullerton, D., Liecester, A., Smith, S. (2008): Environmental Taxes, Working Paper 14197, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Haris, M.J., Riach, B. (2013): Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: A Contemporary Approach, Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University, Medford, USA.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-20

How to Cite

B. Mihajlović , M. ., & R. Jeremić, D. . (2020). THE ROLE OF FISCAL POLICY IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. KULTURA POLISA, 17(43), 541–551. Retrieved from http://www.kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/225

Issue

Section

Review Article

Categories

Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)