JAVNA POLITIKA U OBLASTI DIGITALIZACIJE I E-UPRAVA KAO FAKTORI POBOLJŠANE SOCIO-EKONOMSKE KOHEZIJE U EVROPSKOJ UNIJI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2022.19.4r.146mKljučne reči:
digitalizacija, javne politike, e-uprava, DESI indeks, Evropska komisijaApstrakt
U radu ispitujem kako su javne politike u domenu digitalne transformacije i e-uprave doprinele socio-ekonomskoj koheziji u Evropskoj uniji (EU) i njenim državama članicama, uzimajucí u obzir DESI indikatore merenja i merila e-Uprave u period od 2016. do 2021. godine. Korišcé njem metoda analize podataka i analize sadržaja dokumenata saznajemo da proces digitalizacije jedinstvenog tržišta EU i usluga javne uprave država članica utiču na ekonomsku produktivnost i otpornost privrednih kapaciteta država članica, čime se smanjuju ekonomske razlike i podstiče društveni razvoj. Zaključak je da su digitalne javne politike i e-uprava duboko uticale na procese integracije ekonomskog sektora i na taj način poboljšale stanje socioekonomske kohezije u Evropskoj uniji i njenim državama članicama.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Burwell, F. G., & Propp, K. (2020, June 22). The European Union and the search for digital sovereignty: building "fortress Europe" or preparing for a new world?. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/indepth-research-reports/issue-brief/the-european-union-and-the-searchfor-digital-sovereignty/
Dahl, R., & Lindblom, C. E. (1953). Politics, economics and welfare. Harper. Djurković, M. (2022). Biotechnology, digitalization, and immigration: New challenges for the theory and practice of international relations. Kultura polisa, 19(3), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2022.19.3r.22mdj
European Commission (2010, March 3). Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth. Communication from the Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf
European Commission (2017). Seventh report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/informationsources/publications/reports/2017/7th-report-on-economic-socialand-territorial-cohesion_en
European Commission (2019, September 10). The von der Leyen commission: for a union that strives for more. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_19_5542
European Commission (2021a, November 12). Questions and answers: Digital economy and society index (DESI). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/QANDA_21_5483
European Commission (2021b, November 12). eGovernment benchmark 2021. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/egovernmentbenchmark-2021
European Commission (2022a, n.d.). The digital economy and society index (DESI). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi
European Commission (2022b). Eighth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/reports/2022/eighth-report-on-economic-social-and-territorialcohesion
Golić, D. (2015). Globalizacija i državna suverenost [Globalisation and the state sovereignty]. Kultura polisa, 12(1), 23–37.
Graetz, G., & Michaels, G. (2018). Robots at work. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 753–768. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00754
Hulse, K., & Stone, W. (2007). Social cohesion, social capital and social exclusion. Policy Studies, 28(2), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870701309049
Kiss, M. (2017). Digital skills in the EU labour market. European Parliamentary Research Service.https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2017/595889/EPRS_IDA(2017)595889_EN.pdf
Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002a). Governance and globalization: conceptualizing the role of public and private actors. Common goods: reinventing European and international governance, 85–104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27265472_Governance_and_globalization_conceptualizing_the_role_of_public_and_private_actors
Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002b). Private actors and the state: Internationalization and changing patterns of governance. Governance, 15(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00179
Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments. Governance, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x
Marcus, J. S., Petropoulos, G., & Yeung, T. (2019). Contribution to growth: the european digital single market delivering economic benefits for citizens and businesses. Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/631044/IPOL_STU(2019)631044_EN.pdf
Pérez-Morote, R., Pontones-Rosa, C., & Núñez-Chicharro, M. (2020). The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119973
Rakauskienė, O. G., & Kozlovskij, V. (2014). Overview of EU economic cohesion process performance for new member states. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 284–292. https://doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.872
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. On electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC. The European Parliament & the Council of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, L 257. https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014R0910&from=EN
Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business. Škorić, S. (2020). The application of digital technology in business registration. Pravo – teorija i praksa, 37(4), 1–12.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
##category.category##
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2022 Petar Milutinović
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
