ODUZIMANJE IMOVINE PROISTEKLE IZ KRIVIČNOG DELA KAO MERA BORBE PROTIV ORGANIZOVANOG KRIMINALA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2023.20.1r.87msndKljučne reči:
oduzimanje imovine, organizovani kriminalitet, pranje novca, ekonomski kriminalitet, Direktiva 2014/41/EUApstrakt
Analiza većine definicija organizovanog kriminaliteta ukazuje na činjenicu da je njegov osnovni cilj sticanje finansijske dobiti. Zbog toga je jedna od osnovnih mera koja najviše i pogađa organizovani kriminalitet oduzimanje nezakonito stečene imovine. Svrha tog oduzimanja, kroz različite istorijske epohe, bila je kažnjavanje učinioca krivičnog dela, nadoknada štete oštećenom ili generalna prevencija i odvraćanje drugih od činjenja krivičnih dela. Cilј ovog rada je da pregledom naučne literature i analizom sadržaja različitih zakonskih akata i dokumenata, uz primenu komparativnog metoda, ukažemo na specifičnosti instituta oduzimanja imovine stečene kriminalnim aktivnostima kao jedne od mera u borbi protiv organizovanog kriminala. Oduzimanja imovine kao posebna mera u borbi protiv kriminala naišla je na brojne kritike i kontroverze u domaćoj i stranoj literaturi što će biti predmet posebnog dela ovog rada. Oduzimanje imovine se razlikuje od zemlјe do zemlјe zbog različitih zakonskih kvalifikacija što otežava primenu ovog instituta na jedinstven način na globalnom nivou. Ukazujemo na rezultate koje je ova mera dala na međunarodnom nivo i uspešnost i kritiku njene primene u domaćem zakonodavstvu i praksi.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Boudreaux, D. J., & Pritchard, A. C. (1996). Innocence lost: Bennis v Michigan and the forfeiture tradition. Missouri Law Review, 61(3), 593–632. https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol61/iss3/3
Directive 2014/42/EU. Directive on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union. European Parliament and the Council. Official Journal of the European Union, L 127, 29.4.2014, p. 39–50 (curent consolidated version: 19/05/2014). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/42/2014-05-19
Doyle, C. (2023, January 10). Crime and forfeiture: In short (version 9, updated). Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/
Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism [CETS No. 198]. Council of Europe Treaty Series 198, Warsaw, 16/05/2005. https://rm.coe.int/168008371f
Fourie, M. & Pienaar, G. (2017). Tracing the roots of forfeiture and the loss of property in English and American law. Fundamina (Pretoria), 23(1), 20– 38. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2017/v23n1a2
Greek, C. (1992). Drug control and asset seizures: A review of the history of forfeiture in England and colonial America. In T. Mieczkowski (Ed.), Drugs, crime, and social policy: Research, issues, and concerns. Allyn & Bacon.
Ignjatović, A. (2007). Krivično pravo. Opšti deo. Univerzitet Privredna akademija u Novom Sadu: Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe u Novom Sadu.
Ilić, G., Nikolić, B., Majić, M., & Melilo, D. J. (Eds.) (2009). Komentar Zakona o oduzimanju imovine proistekle iz krivičnog dela sa pregledom relevantnih međunarodnih dokumenata, uporednopravnih rešenja iz prakse ESLJP Commentary on the Law on confiscation of property resulting from a criminal offense with an overview of relevant international documents, comparative law solutions and ECHR practice. OEBS Misija u Srbiji.
International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism [ICSFT]. (1999, December 9). A/RES/54/109. https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/docs/A_RES_54_109-E.pdf
Jovašević, D. (2022). Application of confiscation of property as a non-institutional form of response to property crime. Zbornik radova Centra za edukaciju sudija i tužilaca Republike Srpske, 13(13). https://doi.org/10.7251/CEST1322023J
Kelly, B. D., & Kole, M. (2016). The effects of asset forfeiture on policing: A panel approach. Economic Inquiry, 54(1), 558–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12232
Lajić, O. (2012). Uporedni pregled sistema za istraživanje i oduzimanje imovine stečene kriminalom A comparative review of systems for investigating and confiscating criminal assets. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, 46(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2419
Laudatti, A. (2007). Il sistema di contrasto alla ricchezza illecita nella legislazione europea [The system for combating illicit wealth in European legislation]. In International conference on asset forfeiture, Belgrade: Special Prosecutor’s Office Belgrade. US Department of Justice OPDAT & US Embassy of Belgrade, OSCE – Mission to Serbia.
Levi, M., & Osofsky, L. (1995). Investigating, seizing and confiscating the proceeds of crime. London: Home Office Police Department.
Ligeti, C., & Simonato, M. (2017). Tracing the proceeds of crime: Challenges and perspectives of asset recovery in the EU. Hart Publishing.
Manes, V. (2016). The last imperative of criminal policy: Nullum Crimen Sine Confiscatione. EuCLR European Criminal Law Review, 6(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2016-2-143
Marković, D. M., & Spaić, I. (2021). Globalizacija organizovanog kriminala i transformacija u moćnu ekonomsku i oružanu silu [Organized crime globalization and transformation into a powerful economic and armed force]. Kultura polisa, 18(2), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2021.18.2p.1.03
McCaw, C. E. (2011). Asset forfeiture as a form of punishment: A case for integrating asset forfeiture into criminal sentencing. American Journal of Criminal Law, 38(2), 181–220. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ajcl38& div=11&id=&page=
Naylor, R. T. (1999). Follow-the-money methods in crime control policy. Nathanson Centre for the Study of Organized Crime and Corruption Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto.
Nicholson, L. H. (2007). The Culture of under-enforcement: Buried treasure, Sarbanes-Oxley and the corporate pirate. DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal, 5(2), 321–377. https://via.library.depaul.edu/bclj/vol5/iss2/5
Simonato, M. (2016). Directive 2014/42/EU and Non-Conviction Based Confiscation: A Step Forward on Asset Recovery? New Journal of European Criminal Law 6(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441500600205
Stojanović, Z. (2009). Krivično pravo. Opšti deo. (šesnaesto izmenjeno izdanje). Pravna knjiga.
Tešić, N. (2018). Da li je pravo sledovanja ustavom zaštićeni imovinski interes i u odnosu na Republiku Srbiju Is the right of succession a constitutionally protected property interest in relation to the Republic of Serbia. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66(1), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFUB_18204A
Torbica, M. (2010). Oduzimanje imovine stečene kriminalom u Srbiji i zemljama jugoistočne Evrope [Confiscation of property acquired through crime in Serbia and the countries of Southeast Europe. PRAVO – teorija i praksa, 27(9–10), 104–118.
Van Jaarsveld, I. L. (2006). The history of in rem forfeiture – a penal legacy of the past. Fundamina 12(2), 137–147.
Vettori, B. (2007). Tough on criminal wealth: Exploring the practice of proceeds from crime confiscation in the EU. Springer Science & Business Media.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
##category.category##
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2023 Boro Merdović, Katarina Stojković Numanović, Joko Dragojlović
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
